Funding opportunities

Specification of Ventricular Myocyte and Pacemaker Lineages Utilizing Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Funding Type: 
SEED Grant
Grant Number: 
RS1-00198
Principle Investigator: 
Funds requested: 
$609 999
Funding Recommendations: 
Recommended
Grant approved: 
Yes
Public Abstract: 
Statement of Benefit to California: 
Review Summary: 
SYNOPSIS: In this proposal, the investigators wish to generate cardiomyocytes from hESCs. This will be accomplished using cells engineerd to express fluorochromes from the Isl1 promoter alone or combined with the MLC2v or HCN4 promoter, the latter identifying ventricular myocytes vs. pacemaker cells respectively. Libraries of small molecules will be screened to identify those that support cardiomyocyte conversion and subsequently ventricular and pacemaker cell conversion. SIGNIFICANCE AND INNOVATION: This proposal targets the differentiation of cardiac cell types from human embryonic stem cells. These cells can then be used as both a platform to understand the basics of ventricular myocyte and cardiac pacemaker cell lineage specification and alternatively as a source of cell-based cardiovascular therapy. The PI, who is a leader in her field, proposes two specific aims. The first specific aim is to develop, phenotype, and perform preliminary screens of hESC lines genetically engineered to express isl1-GFP. hESCs with GFP targeted to the isl1 locus will be established, characterized, and utilized in preliminary small molecule screens for optimal conversion to cardiovascular progenitors. The second specific aim is to genetically engineer hESC lines from parent isl1-nGFP hESC lines which co-express is isl1-nGFP and MLC2v-Red Cherry) cR) or is isl1-nGFP and HCN4-cRC, as markers specific for ventricular and pacemaker cell lineages, respectively. Understanding the pathways required for specification, proliferation, and differentiation of hESCs into these two cardiac cell lineages are a necessary and essential component for both the basic understanding of this important differentiation event as well as the potential for clinical settings. It is thus extremely significant and of the highest priority. This grant is also innovative, as it courageously tackles genetic engineering of hESCs, which unlike the mouse system (mESCs) is either inexistent or in its infancy. STRENGTHS: The PI has a track record of high productively in solving the molecular basis of lineage restrictions toward cardiac cell fates. Previous work from the applicant's laboratory in model systems has established the basis of our current understanding in this lineage acquisition. Additionally, generating hESCs that express stable markers of cell differentiations, in this particular case the isl-GFP line is one of the most secure ways to approach this problem if the technical problems can be overcome. The small molecule screen described on specific aim 1 is bound to identify individual compounds with the ability to turn on the isl1-GFP promoter efficiently. Finally, the generation of doubly-targeted hESCs distinguishing between ventricular and pacemaker cell lineages are inevitably going to allow linkage to specific signaling pathways as well characterization of active compounds that have the ability to induce one cell type versus the other. WEAKNESSES: Previous attempts in characterizing small molecules with specific activities toward the induction of a particular cell type using stably marked embryonic stem cells have been efficient in characterizing compounds. However, limiting factors downstream of this characterization have been to address the specificity of these compounds toward other biological activities. So while many good candidates can be identified by this type of approach, and most are very useful in the context of basic science approaches, it is not very clear how these compounds will be useful in clinical settings. DISCUSSION: The proposal was regarded as very well written and very well reasoned. The use of non-federally-approved lines for screening is deemed a smart choice. It was felt that the use of these cells over federally-approved lines might also allow knock-in strategies to work but there was concern that a two-step knock-in approach presents a significant challenge; the BAC "back-up" strategy was praised. A discussant voiced an alternative view that the anticipated results of this work would not be significant.
Conflicts: 

© 2013 California Institute for Regenerative Medicine