DNA demethylation dynamics.
Publication Year:
2011
PubMed ID:
21925312
Funding Grants:
Public Summary:
The significant impact of DNA methylation patterns on cell and
organismal fate is perhaps most graphically exemplified in
honeybees, in which differential DNA methylation determines
whether the bee will be a worker or a queen (Kucharski et al.,
2008). In mammals, DNA methylation has also long been considered
integral to fundamental choices, including the long-term
gene silencing that leads to genomic imprinting, X chromosome
inactivation, suppression of transposable elements, and the
establishment and maintenance of stable cellular identities
(Bird, 2002; De Carvalho et al., 2010; Deaton and Bird, 2011;
Goll and Bestor, 2005; Jaenisch and Bird, 2003). Yet, studies
of cellular reprogramming by three approaches—nuclear transfer,
cell fusion, and induced pluripotency by defined factors
(i.e., iPSCs)—all demonstrate that ‘‘fixed and stable’’ differentiated
cellular states can be radically altered (Jullien et al., 2011;
Yamanaka and Blau, 2010). Concurrently, accumulating evidence
has suggested that DNA methylation may be reversible
in mammalian cells; however, knowledge of the requisite molecules
and mechanisms underlying this process has been lacking.
In this Perspective, we focus on recent reports that now identify
enzymes capable of mediating DNA demethylation in mammalian
cells. These findings raise the possibility that regulation by
DNA methylation is at times quite dynamic, providing exciting
insights into why reprogramming of cell fates is possible.
Scientific Abstract:
The discovery of cytosine hydroxymethylation (5hmC) suggested a simple means of demethylating DNA and activating genes. Further experiments, however, unearthed an unexpectedly complex process, entailing both passive and active mechanisms of DNA demethylation by the ten-eleven translocation (TET) and AID/APOBEC families of enzymes. The consensus emerging from these studies is that removal of cytosine methylation in mammalian cells can occur by DNA repair. These reports highlight that in certain contexts, DNA methylation is not fixed but dynamic, requiring continuous regulation.